You help make Hymnary.org possible. More than 10 million people from 200+ countries found hymns, liturgical resources and encouragement on Hymnary.org in 2025, including you. Every visit affirms the global impact of this ministry.

If Hymnary has been meaningful to you this year, would you take a moment today to help sustain it? A gift of any size—paired with a note of encouragement if you wish—directly supports the server costs, research work and curation that keep this resource freely available to the world.

Give securely online today, or mail a check to:
Hymnary.org
Calvin University
3201 Burton Street SE
Grand Rapids, MI 49546

Thank you for your partnership, and may the hope of Advent fill your heart.

Old 104th or Old Hundred-Fourth?

You are here

I notice there are tune authorities called

old_hundredth_bourgeois - 219 instances ("hymnals" is probably too strong a term)
old_hundred_fourth - 2 instances
old_104th - 11 instances
old_107th_bourgeois - 6 instances
old_hundred_seventh - 2 instances

The second and third, and the fourth and fifth, appear to be pairs of identical tunes, but I am not at all sure in which direction(s) to merge them. Do we prefer numerals or spelled-out numbers, and do we prefer adding "_bourgeois" anywhere he may have been involved, or sparingly? And if we follow the consensus and go with Old 104th and Old 107th, then ought we not consistently move Old Hundredth to Old 100th? Or is that the foolish consistency Emerson spoke of?


Comments

There is not a consistency. Most hymnals have OLD 100TH spelled out OLD HUNDREDTH, so that is the authority. The other tunes are mostly OLD 104TH and OLD 107TH. I've merged these.

It looks like you are using an ad-blocker. Ad revenue helps keep us running. Please consider white-listing Hymnary.org or getting Hymnary Pro to eliminate ads entirely and help support Hymnary.org.